Every Texas Hold’em Starting Hand Ranked by Win Rate

Steve Topson
August 7, 2026
6 Views

The strongest Texas Hold’em starting hand is AA at 85.1% equity, while the weakest is 32o at 32.45%. These results come from a heads-up simulation of all 169 canonical starting hands against a single random opponent, in which every hand still wins at least around one-third of the time.

How we ran this

This study ranks all 169 canonical Texas Hold’em starting hands by their equity against one randomly dealt opponent hand. The canonical set groups every two-card combination that shares the same ranks and suitedness into a single abstract starting hand, which is the standard shorthand in poker analysis. Each hand was simulated 12,000 times using hands.poker’s own equity engine, the same Monte Carlo evaluator that powers the site’s hand equity calculator.

At every trial, the engine deals a random two-card hand to the opponent and a complete five-card board from the remaining deck. It then evaluates both hands according to standard poker hand rankings and records a win, a loss, or a tie. The reported metric is equity, defined as the win percentage plus half of the tie percentage. A tie is worth half a point because both players split the pot at showdown.

A single random opponent is the fairest possible baseline for measuring raw hand strength. It averages over every hole-card combination the opponent could hold, so no specific matchup skews the results. The 12,000 trials per hand keep the equity estimates stable, and the same engine is available on the site so any reader can reproduce a row or test a different matchup. Heads-up is the cleanest reference point because the all-in comparison is a pure test of card strength.

The resulting table is a preflop strength ranking only. It removes position, betting, and post-flop decision-making from the equation. Those factors matter in real poker, but this table answers one specific question: if you race all-in preflop against an unknown random hand, how often do you win?

One caveat applies to every row: multiway pots are different. Hands that win a small majority heads-up can lose money in three-way all-ins, and flush potential matters less when extra opponents hold cards from the same suits. This table is a heads-up reference, not a universal hand ranking for every game situation.

Key findings

Six findings stand out from the 169-hand ranking.

  • AA is the strongest hand at 85.1% equity, ahead of KK at 82.41% and QQ at 79.61%. The top of the table is dominated by premium pairs.
  • Pocket pairs hold eight of the top ten slots: AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT, 99, 88, and 77. The only non-pairs in the top ten are AKs at 66.87% and AQs at 66.44%, and AQs edges out 77 at 66.43% by a fraction of a point.
  • Suitedness adds a measurable edge. AKs records 66.87% equity while AKo records 65.58%, a 1.3 point difference that comes from flush potential alone. That edge is precisely what separates the two versions of ace-king in the ranking.
  • The median hand is Q3s at 50.46% equity, placing it at the exact midpoint of the 169-hand table. Every hand above this line holds a positive equity edge against a random opponent, and every hand below it is a statistical underdog.
  • All 13 pocket pairs rank in the stronger half of the field. The lowest pair, 22, sits at rank 88 with 49.72% equity, making it barely below break-even against any random two cards.
  • The bottom of the table is not worthless. The worst hand, 32o, still wins 32.45% against a random opponent, so all 169 hands start with meaningful equity and are never drawing dead before the flop.

The ranking below orders all 169 hands by this equity metric. Because the opponent is a uniform random hand, the order is a pure function of preflop card strength.

The full ranking

Rank Hand Equity Win %
1 AA 85.1% 84.82%
2 KK 82.41% 82.12%
3 QQ 79.61% 79.33%
4 JJ 77.19% 76.88%
5 TT 75.95% 75.64%
6 99 71.65% 71.28%
7 88 68.64% 68.18%
8 AKs 66.87% 66.01%
9 AQs 66.44% 65.45%
10 77 66.43% 65.97%
11 AKo 65.58% 64.74%
12 AJs 65.54% 64.48%
13 ATs 64.48% 63.32%
14 AQo 64.34% 63.49%
15 KQs 63.88% 62.83%
16 66 63.62% 63.06%
17 A9s 62.93% 61.7%
18 AJo 62.92% 61.78%
19 ATo 62.82% 61.67%
20 KJs 62.8% 61.67%
21 A8s 62.1% 60.71%
22 KQo 61.46% 60.42%
23 A9o 61.36% 59.92%
24 KTs 61.1% 60.04%
25 A7s 60.89% 59.37%
26 QJs 60.83% 59.73%
27 KJo 60.51% 59.33%
28 K9s 60.29% 58.88%
29 KTo 59.99% 58.62%
30 55 59.85% 59.18%
31 A5s 59.67% 57.77%
32 A8o 59.62% 58.15%
33 QTs 59.61% 58.26%
34 A7o 59.12% 57.44%
35 A6s 58.97% 57.23%
36 A4s 58.43% 56.57%
37 A3s 58.42% 56.66%
38 K8s 58.42% 56.93%
39 QTo 58.2% 56.79%
40 A6o 58.2% 56.61%
41 K7s 57.91% 56.27%
42 QJo 57.77% 56.58%
43 K9o 57.7% 56.22%
44 A2s 57.42% 55.49%
45 A5o 57.39% 55.31%
46 JTs 57.27% 55.91%
47 K6s 57.09% 55.21%
48 Q9s 56.96% 55.53%
49 44 56.84% 56.15%
50 A4o 56.63% 54.66%
51 K8o 56.32% 54.83%
52 Q8s 55.96% 54.31%
53 K5s 55.53% 53.61%
54 J9s 55.44% 53.97%
55 K4s 55.27% 53.28%
56 A3o 55.2% 53.23%
57 K7o 55.13% 53.4%
58 JTo 54.95% 53.47%
59 A2o 54.87% 52.93%
60 Q9o 54.77% 53.4%
61 T9s 54.61% 52.99%
62 Q7s 54.48% 52.76%
63 K3s 54.33% 52.54%
64 Q8o 53.94% 52.21%
65 K6o 53.85% 51.88%
66 Q6s 53.84% 51.84%
67 33 53.76% 52.96%
68 K2s 53.52% 51.6%
69 J8s 53.46% 51.9%
70 J9o 53.23% 51.6%
71 Q5s 53.13% 51.31%
72 K5o 53.04% 50.92%
73 K4o 52.7% 50.72%
74 T8s 52.41% 50.63%
75 J7s 51.95% 49.99%
76 Q4s 51.87% 49.95%
77 K3o 51.76% 49.63%
78 J8o 51.73% 49.88%
79 T7s 51.68% 49.87%
80 Q7o 51.66% 49.68%
81 T9o 51.61% 49.87%
82 Q6o 50.83% 48.64%
83 98s 50.76% 48.69%
84 Q2s 50.47% 48.41%
85 Q3s 50.46% 48.51%
86 J5s 49.96% 47.75%
87 J6s 49.8% 47.83%
88 22 49.72% 48.76%
89 K2o 49.67% 47.55%
90 Q5o 49.52% 47.46%
91 T8o 49.25% 47.4%
92 J7o 49.23% 47.14%
93 T6s 49.19% 47.09%
94 97s 49.05% 46.91%
95 Q4o 48.93% 46.8%
96 J4s 48.77% 46.55%
97 Q3o 48.63% 46.35%
98 98o 48.14% 46.23%
99 87s 47.96% 45.8%
100 J5o 47.82% 45.53%
101 T7o 47.75% 45.52%
102 J3s 47.69% 45.47%
103 J6o 47.69% 45.38%
104 Q2o 47.68% 45.56%
105 J2s 47.51% 45.47%
106 96s 47.13% 44.88%
107 T5s 46.8% 44.78%
108 J4o 46.58% 44.3%
109 T4s 46.27% 43.64%
110 97o 46.27% 43.82%
111 T3s 46.13% 43.7%
112 T6o 45.95% 43.78%
113 86s 45.88% 43.33%
114 95s 45.82% 43.33%
115 76s 45.75% 43.17%
116 87o 45.63% 43.39%
117 T2s 45.2% 42.97%
118 85s 45.01% 42.51%
119 J3o 44.87% 42.55%
120 96o 44.61% 42.32%
121 J2o 44.18% 41.98%
122 94s 44.17% 41.81%
123 75s 43.87% 41.14%
124 T5o 43.81% 41.27%
125 84s 43.27% 40.64%
126 86o 43.24% 40.8%
127 65s 42.9% 40.28%
128 T4o 42.86% 40.38%
129 92s 42.67% 40.08%
130 93s 42.43% 39.94%
131 T3o 42.39% 39.95%
132 76o 42.33% 39.72%
133 95o 42.1% 39.5%
134 85o 41.82% 39.1%
135 T2o 41.65% 39.29%
136 74s 41.58% 38.63%
137 64s 41.52% 38.67%
138 54s 41.51% 38.63%
139 83s 41.16% 38.53%
140 94o 41.12% 38.56%
141 53s 40.99% 38.04%
142 75o 40.48% 37.64%
143 82s 40.41% 37.86%
144 65o 40.28% 37.29%
145 93o 40.27% 37.71%
146 84o 39.91% 37.18%
147 73s 39.87% 37.21%
148 63s 39.57% 36.73%
149 92o 39.32% 36.97%
150 43s 38.78% 35.74%
151 64o 38.72% 35.91%
152 74o 38.39% 35.66%
153 62s 38.25% 35.27%
154 54o 37.95% 35.01%
155 52s 37.73% 34.77%
156 72s 37.52% 34.77%
157 82o 37.45% 34.58%
158 83o 37.4% 34.67%
159 63o 36.95% 33.98%
160 42s 36.91% 33.95%
161 73o 36.78% 34.02%
162 53o 36.36% 33.36%
163 32s 35.41% 32.58%
164 72o 34.82% 31.92%
165 43o 34.75% 31.65%
166 52o 34% 30.95%
167 42o 33.8% 30.68%
168 62o 33.79% 30.68%
169 32o 32.45% 29.41%

To test any matchup with the same Monte Carlo engine used in this study, open the hand equity calculator. It supports specific hand versus hand comparisons as well as range scenarios. To review the poker hand rankings that decide every simulation and every real showdown, consult the guide to what beats what in poker.

Author Steve Topson